Jun 01 2008

CA: Prop 99 - Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied Residence. Constitutional Amendment.

Published by Steven at 12:25 am under Politics
Tags: ,

Why must the government be so confusing? Proposition 98 and 99 are related on the subject matter yet have slight differences. If proposition 99 passes, proposition 98 would not take into effect and vice versa.

Proposition 99 is less confusing than 98 and does not have the added issue of rent control. Proposition 99 would prohibit the government from taking a single-family home or condominium through eminent domain and transferring the property to another private owner.

Of course there are some caveats.

The property can still be taken if:
(1) the property poses a public safety and health risk;
(2) the property needs to be used for public work;
(3) or the property was used for criminal activities.

This amendment does not apply if the owner did not live on the property or had not lived there for more than half a year.

This amendment would be a pretty big change. A while back when SBC Park was first built on the China Basin in San Francisco, the area around the park was dilapidated. When redevelopment plans were laid out for the area, the City was in their right to acquire the surrounding properties and transfer them to a development agency. The reason would fall under the blight and redevelopment for economic purposes issue. This proposition would stop these type of seizures.

So a vote of Yes would make development agencies build around your home.

A vote of no would keep things status quo while also opening the door for the passing of Proposition 98.

6 Responses to “CA: Prop 99 - Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied Residence. Constitutional Amendment.”

  1. proposition 99 | Lasts informationon 03 Jun 2008 at 10:47 am

    [...] CA: Prop 99 - Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied …Proposition 98 and 99 are related on the subject matter yet have slight differences. If proposition 99 passes, proposition 98 would not take into effect and vice versa. Proposition 99 is less confusing than 98 and does not have the …Frobie - http://www.frobie.com [...]

  2. proposition 99 | Hottagson 03 Jun 2008 at 10:47 am

    [...] CA: Prop 99 - Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied …Proposition 98 and 99 are related on the subject matter yet have slight differences. If proposition 99 passes, proposition 98 would not take into effect and vice versa. Proposition 99 is less confusing than 98 and does not have the …Frobie - http://www.frobie.com [...]

  3. proposition 99 | Wonderful Articleon 03 Jun 2008 at 11:11 am

    [...] seized by the government …One Citizen Speaking… - http://www.onecitizenspeaking.com/|||CA: Prop 99 - Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied …Proposition 98 and 99 are related on the subject matter yet have slight differences. If proposition [...]

  4. proposition 99 | Information Blogon 03 Jun 2008 at 3:38 pm

    [...] CA: Prop 99 - Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied …1 Jun 2008 by Steven Proposition 98 and 99 are related on the subject matter yet have slight differences. If proposition 99 passes, proposition 98 would not take into effect and vice versa. Proposition 99 is less confusing than 98 and does not have the …Frobie - http://www.frobie.com [...]

  5. proposition 99on 03 Jun 2008 at 6:56 pm

    [...] CA: Prop 99 - Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied …Proposition 98 and 99 are related on the subject matter yet have slight differences. If proposition 99 passes, proposition 98 would not take into effect and vice versa. Proposition 99 is less confusing than 98 and does not have the … [...]

  6. [...] Prop. 99: Eminent Domain. Acquisition of Owner-Occupied Residence. Constitutional Amendment. passed with 2,129,247 (62%) YES votes compared with 1,282,763 (38%) NO votes making things a little bit more difficult for the government to take homes using eminent domain. San Francisco Propositions [...]

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply